THE DECISION IS IN
we here at sound destruction have convened and decided we will not discuss court cases involving music icons accused of salacious misconduct.
...unless it is about phil spector...then its fair game (see previous post)
posted by M. Martin at 12:32 PM
12 Comments:
Agreed, it would be dangerous to discuss any smooth criminials who beat it. ;)
Oh, Spector is so guilty.
i agree.
spector is guilty.
the question is will he get off or not...
I'm so sick of MJ I could puke. Your conscientious objection is is noted and hugely appreciated.
SIGH!
Remember real news? :-/
Probably not... As MJ proved yesterday (and OJ and Robert Blake before him,) if you're a rich and famous white man in California, you won't be convicted.
(And that's a *blue* state, by the way... In case y'all forgot. :))
Phil's my kind of guy!
Jet - I'll see your sigh and raise you a groan!
tlm - the key difference being "rich and famous", because the CA courts (thankfully) didn't bode so well for Scott Peterson.
The devil - could it be Saaaaaatin?
I wonder if Phil's hiding the murder weapon in that hair. Has anyone checked?
Hahahaha, excellent choice.
And I wonder if Phil's birthday is coming up, because he might need a pick for that 'fro.
Cynikell - Phil Spector HIMSELF could hide in that hair!
CW - A pick wouldn't stand a chance. He needs something more innovative like bbq prongs.
...and I still believe Pete Townsend is innocent!
hey... pete townsend was doing research!
(whoever bought that pile of crap must also belives the unnamed pop star didnt have a thing for boys)
Post a Comment
<< Home